The competition across the channel was led by a familiar face. Oh, the smugness, the attitude, the cranked-up torture through the day. Terror in Europe, the upturned, proud faces of the Delhi guys and gals.
Who was the familiar person, this specialist on metal? How would you know, did she introduce herself? Did she have a social media account, an Insta presence, that you'd know that she was comfortable with scrutiny? So more shadowy and dubious figures, hence Delhi was comfortable, the entire Delhi-NCR area could spin it any way they wanted.
Let's say your name was Goring. Have you always been called Goring? What were you called five centuries back? Did you always live in Europe? Which parts of Europe have you lived in? What was your traditional livelihood? Some of us would keep explaining our backgrounds, over and over again, and then get punished by Mumbai tycoons for discussing the narrative. The rest could just spread rumours and influence the torture on Antara?
Write something, for heaven's sake. Such familiarity with Jews, Orthodox Jews at that, sending them over to Britain since the 18th century, settling them at Hackney, what a wonderful narrative. Yet didn't stand up to the Fuhrer and share his glorious (former) friendship with the Hasidim, it could have saved the lives of those six million that had not managed to immigrate to Hackney, London.
We get it, the officials were too confident of your Hasidim narrative to bother your privacy. You didn't need the principal, that was for those pursuing the nefarious way of becoming wealthy. You were fond of the interest, the 'sood' as they called it in Hindi.
What were they called, Manu-bhaiya, so that's Manu-da of Bengal politics, SS Ray of the so-called Naxal troubles. Another 'sood' was Kuku-bhaiya, so the unhinged German intelligence.
Oh, wait, wasn't Manu and unhinged German intelligence the topic of the last decade?
So more of the same thing, nothing to offer on Jews or Hasidim or the metal, delaying tactics.
What did you say? The Hackney Jews had a huge House they lent to the British royals? Why didn't the British royals have a House of their own, they've been around forever? It was a structure, a House, you couldn't lose it over a gambling debt.
You have to clear up the confusion you have started, British knighthood types and top US intelligence officials were rushing to Bengaluru to ascertain if there was a way of avoiding Poland and Ukraine for the legit lease.
Antara lived dangerously: those on the surveillance had already been accused of wilful complicity in her slow demise, of knowing and abetting a crime, of not following up on a single threat emanating from Asansol, Durgapur and Kolkata, aimed at Antara.
So the British royals were sustaining their House on the American colonies, lost them in the 1770-80s, and borrowed a House from the Orthodox Jews?
That meant your narrative was neither about the lease nor about currency.
What went on in Bengaluru?
June 10, 2025.
No comments:
Post a Comment